|
A brief background: This
correspondance between Einstein and Freud occured just before
the Nazi Party rose to power in Germany in January 1933. Einstein
was about to leave Germany to be a guest professor at Princeton
University. He thought that the position would be temporary,
but In 1933, the Nazis passed "The Law of the Restoration
of the Civil Service," which forced all Jewish university
professors out of their jobs. His work was considered "Jewish
Physics (in contrast to German or Aryan Phisics) and a campaign
was mounted by the Nazis to blacklist any teachers who taught
Einstein's work.
Sigmund Freud is commonly referred to as
"the father of psychoanalysis" and his work has
been tremendously influential in the popular imagination —
popularizing such notions as the unconscious, defense mechanisms,
and dream symbolism — while also making a long-lasting
impact on fields as diverse as literature, film, Marxist and
feminist theories, literary criticism, philosophy and psychology.
Why
War? (Warum Krieg?) In 1932 Albert Einstein was contacted
by the League of Nations, the international body that was
the precursor of the UN. He was asked to invite someone --
he could choose anyone -- to reflect with him in a series
of public letters on a pressing problem or question. The question
Einstein selected was this: "Is there any way of delivering
humankind from the menace of war?" He was asking the
question that many of us are asking today: "How can we
promote peace?"
He chose his interlocutor carefully. The physicist
with unprecedented understanding of the structure and workings
of the universe selected a thinker with unprecedented insight
into the structure and workings of the human mind: Sigmund
Freud. Freud readily agreed to participate in this conversation.
He had just published Civilization and its Discontents,
in which he had offered a complex analysis of the psychological
difficulties of living together in community. Yet his response
to Einstein's question about peace was surprisingly optimistic.1
Here is a summary of their dialogue:
Summary of Einstein's Letter, dated 30th July 1932 (my
own comments are in gray)
Einstein expresses how happy he is through the
initiative of the League of Nations to correspond with a person
of his choice, and that the opportunity offers a unique chance
to discuss what he considers the most important question currently
facing civilisation with Freud. He then goes straight to the
question: "Is there a way to free people from the spectre
of war?".
He says, it has become apparent that through
the advances of technology it is now possible to wipe
out humankind. Despite this fact all attempts at a solution
have failed frighteningly.
He has come to the conclusion that people who
are involved in avoiding war in practise, through their professions
(e.g. diplomats, politicians, peace organizations) have reached
a point, partly out of a feeling of helplessness, where they
would welcome the input of people who have gained a certain
amount of distance to all life questions due to their scientific
work.
Einstein says his thinking gives him little
insight into the depths of human feelings and desires. Therefore,
all he can do is to pose the questions and give answers he
hopes Freud can expand on, due to his "deep insight into human
urges and desires". Further, Einstein hopes Freud will be
able to point to unpolitical ways of education that could
remove psychological barriers that a normal person does not
see.
The only possible solution - A supreme court
of all nations
The only possible solution Einstein sees, is
for the nations of the world to create a legislative and legal
body that will be called upon in all matters of conflict that
may arise between them. A sort of Supreme Court of all nations.
All nations would agree to call upon this court when conflict
arises and to follow the decisions and directives of this
court.
He is quick to point out that the first problem
with any court is, that it is an institution created by people.
Such a court will be all the more prone to influences from
outside the court if its own power is insufficient to enforce
its decisions in practice. It is a fact of life that power
and the law are intertwined. The decisions of a court will
be closest to the ideas of justice within the society for
which it acts, the more power this society can invest in enforcing
respect for those ideas.
We are far from creating an organisation with
sufficient power to enforce the laws it decrees, Einstein
says. His first conclusion is, that it will be necessary for
nations to give up a certain amount of their sovereignty.
It is without doubt the only way to security.
So far, all attempts in this direction during
the last decades have failed. Obviously strong psychological
mechanisms with the human psyche are working against these
attempts. Some of these mechanisms can be identified. The
minority in power, within any given society, will resist any
infringements upon its power. This striving for power is driven
by materialistic and economic wishes. Einstein refers
to the minority within any society which will stop at nothing
to gain advantages for itself and will not stop at war or
weapons deals in order to increase its own power and influence.
(War itself has become a huge industry
today, with companies like Halliburton influencing Whitehouse
policy based on the tremendous financial benefit of war. For
more on this, i recommend a movie called "Why
We Fight" which documents the Military Industrial
Complex - the collusion between corporations and the military
that formed after WWII.)
Einsteine
spoke of Macht und Recht, power and right, or violence
and law. He called for a world in which Recht would supersede
Macht -- law would supersede violence.
The next question arising from this is, why
does the majority allow itself to be used by the minority
in power? The minority stands to gain and the majority
stands to suffer and to lose. (Einstein includes also soldiers
in the majority, since they have joined the military in the
hope to defend their country).
His answer is that the minority in power
rules over the schools and the press, and also has influence
over the religious organisations. The minority in power uses
these institutions to manipulate and channel the feelings
of the masses in order to use people for their own gain. (Interesting
that in 2007 the "News" itself is part of a for-profit
public company that must increase earnings. This means that,
if NBC runs a mini series on Global Warming that is critical
of the Auto Industry, Companies like GMC and Ford will no
longer advertise on their station)
This however, he claims, cannot be the only
reason that the majority lets itself be used in these ways,
and will indeed let itself be driven to the extent of frenzy
and self-sacrifice. Einstein concludes that there must be
a force within humans, a wish to hate and destroy. A force
which during normal times is dormant, only showing itself
in the abnormal. It can however, easily be awakened, and increased
to the extent of mass-psychosis.
This seems to be the most tragic issue involved
in the emergence of war. At this point Einstein refers to
Freud's knowledge of human desires and urges, hoping Freud
may shed more light on the subject.
Freud said, we are torn between a drive for
Eros or connection, and a drive toward Death, Thanatos,
or Aggression. And indeed, the eagerness to engage in war
is an effect of the drive toward Aggression, which itself
is always embedded in political, social, and economic contexts.
But, he argued, one can bring Eros into play against Aggression:
whatever leads us to share important concerns produces a sense
of community. "Anything that encourages the growth
of emotional ties will operate against war." (this
is why social programs like Social Security and Medicare are
under attack today- Because they encourage emotional ties
and strengthen the population. - They are programs that infer
that you should care about others.)
Then Einstein poses one last question, asking
Freud whether it would be possible to influence the development
of humans in a way which could make them more resistant to
what Einstein calls the psychoses of hate and destruction.
(Note: Freud, in his reply, points out that aggression is
the opposite pole to love, and thus, is a necessary emotional
force which is required for survival. He does not refer to
aggression as a psychotic emotion).
Einstein then notes that he does not have the
so-called "uneducated" people in mind. In his experience it
is more the so-called "intelligentsia" which is open to ideologies,
being the kinds of people who learnt about life from paper,
rather than from experiencing real life situations. Finally,
Einstein comments on the fact that he has only talked about
war and there are other types of human conflict. He says the
reason for concentrating on war, is that it is the most extreme
and destructive, and is therefore the best way to demonstrate
how to prevent conflicts.
In closing, Einstein refers to the fact that
Freud has written about most of the issues involved with the
problem of war either directly or indirectly, however, Einstein
would like to know Freud's opinion on bringing peace to
the world, based on his latest insights, since these
could be useful.
The signed limited edition poster
above will be available in March 2007. The poster is hand
printed on 19x25" archival paper, and is $30. Please
contact me if
you would like to reserve one The design is also available
on t-shirts.
1This text was borrowed from
Freud, Einstein, and Upaya: Contemporary
Reflections on the Question "Why War?"
Click
here for the Full English translation of the correspondence
between Freud and Einstein
*The translation of the letters between Einstein
and Freud were made available in 2002 after international
copyrights had expired. (the original correspondence was in
German) This chapter in history, and the correspondence of
these two great minds is strangely not widely known.
Note: In 1939 Einstein sent a letter to President
Franklin Delano Roosevelt urging the study of nuclear fission
for military purposes, under fears that the Nazi government
would be first to develop nuclear weapons. Roosevelt started
an investigation into the matter which eventually became the
Manhattan Project. Einstein did not work on the bomb project,
and, according to some, he later regretted ever having signed
this letter.
Other related quotes from Albert Einstein:
"Unthinking respect for authority is
the greatest enemy of truth."
"It is my conviction that killing under
the cloak of war is nothing but an act of murder."
"The release of atomic energy has not
created a new problem. It has merely made more urgent the
necessity of solving an existing one."
"Force always attracts men of low morality."
"Peace cannot be kept by force. It
can only be achieved by understanding."
"The world is a dangerous place, not
because of those who do evil, but because of those who look
on and do nothing."
"Nothing will end war unless the people
themselves refuse to go to war."
|